EMTALA and patients with psychiatric emergencies: a review of relevant case law.
نویسندگان
چکیده
STUDY OBJECTIVE Emergency department (ED) care for patients with psychiatric complaints has become increasingly challenging given recent nationwide declines in available inpatient psychiatric beds. This creates pressure to manage psychiatric patients in the ED or as outpatients and may place providers and institutions at risk for liability under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA). We describe the patient characteristics, disposition, and legal outcomes of EMTALA cases involving patients with psychiatric complaints. METHODS Jury verdicts, settlements, and other litigation involving alleged EMTALA violations related to psychiatric patients between the law's enactment in 1986 and the end of 2012 were collected from 3 legal databases (Westlaw, Lexis, and Bloomberg Law). Details about the patient characteristics, disposition, and reasons for litigation were independently abstracted by 2 trained reviewers onto a standardized data form. RESULTS Thirty-three relevant cases were identified. Two cases were decided in favor of the plaintiffs, 4 cases were settled, 10 cases had an unknown outcome, and 17 were decided in favor of the defendant institutions. Most patients in these 33 cases were men, had past psychiatric diagnoses, were not evaluated by a psychiatrist, and eventually committed or attempted suicide. The most frequently successful defense used by institutions was to demonstrate that their providers used a standard screening examination and did not detect an emergency medical condition that required stabilization. CONCLUSION Lawsuits involving alleged EMTALA violations in the care of ED patients with psychiatric complaints are uncommon and rarely successful.
منابع مشابه
Why the EMTALA Mandate for Emergency Care Does not Equal Healthcare “Coverage”
House GOP members Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) and Rep. Raúl Labrador (R-ID) recently made alarming and misleading statements about American emergency departments’ role in U.S. healthcare. In March of this year, while speaking with CNN’s New Day host Alisyn Camerota, Mr. Meadows stated: “The goal is to allow access to all. There’s a federal law right now that if you show up at a hospital, you get c...
متن کاملAn EMTALA primer: the impact of changes in the emergency medicine landscape on EMTALA compliance and enforcement.
Tiana Lee's article provides an overview and update on the latest in the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA). Reviewing the history of the statute, explaining some of the relevant regulations, and exploring government enforcements efforts to date, Ms. Lee highlights the benefits and drawbacks of the statute and recommends ways to ameliorate EMTALA's weaknesses.
متن کاملEMTALA: dedicating an emergency department near you.
Congress enacted the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) in 1986 to prohibit patient dumping. Subsequent to its passage, however, issues concerning the application of EMTALA have vexed hospitals, patients, regulators, and courts. In an attempt to clarify these issues, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recently promulgated new EMTALA regulations. This Article revi...
متن کاملPsychiatric emergencies of childhood and adolescence.
OBJECTIVE The prevalence of psychiatric disorders in childhood/adolescence is of 10-15%.The most frequent causes of psychiatric emergence attendances in this age are: behavioral disturbances, suicidal behavior, and depression.The objective of this study is to present the most relevant clinical issues and to guide the initial procedures of psychiatric emergencies in childhood/adolescence. METH...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Annals of emergency medicine
دوره 64 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014